Skip to main content

Ad

health-iconHealth and Medicinehealth-iconmedicine
clock-iconPUBLISHEDAugust 22, 2024
comments icon3
share48

Hospital Sued For Losing Chunk Of A Man's Skull

As mistakes go, this is a biggie.

Benjamin Taub headshot

Benjamin Taub

Benjamin holds a Master's degree in anthropology from University College London and has previously worked in the fields of psychedelic neuroscience and mental health.

Freelance Writer

Benjamin holds a Master's degree in anthropology from University College London and has previously worked in the fields of psychedelic neuroscience and mental health.View full profile

Benjamin holds a Master's degree in anthropology from University College London and has previously worked in the fields of psychedelic neuroscience and mental health.

View full profile
EditedbyFrancesca Benson
Francesca Benson headshot

Francesca Benson

Copy Editor and Staff Writer

Francesca has an MSci in Biochemistry from the University of Birmingham.

skull

The patient ended up having to pay almost $150,000, according to a complaint.

Image credit: Noiel/Shutterstock.com


A man is suing a hospital in Atlanta, Georgia after doctors allegedly lost a piece of his skull. Unable to retrieve the osseous omission, hospital staff ended up having to rebuild the patient’s cranium with a custom-made synthetic implant - and he was charged thousands of dollars for the procedure, according to a legal complaint.

The rest of this article is behind a paywall. Please sign in or subscribe to access the full content.

The alleged incident occurred when Fernando Cluster was admitted to Emory University Hospital Midtown in September 2022 after experiencing a brain hemorrhage. To relieve pressure on his brain, doctors performed a hemicraniectomy, removing a section of skull measuring 12 by 15 centimeters (4.7 by 5.9 inches).

Such procedures are typically carried out in emergency situations, when swelling and bleeding of the brain become so severe that the threat of compression and brain damage needs to be addressed. 

Typically, the excised portion of skull is then kept in a freezer for a period of time while doctors wait for the swelling to go down, at which point it is reattached to the patient. In the meantime, patients are usually given a protective helmet to wear in lieu of a fully intact cranium.

However, according to the complaint, surgeons’ mislabeling of body parts meant they were unable to identify Cluster’s bone when the time came to re-implant it some six weeks later. 

“When Emory’s personnel went to retrieve the bone flap, ‘there were several bone flaps with incomplete or missing patient identification’ and therefore, Emory ‘could not be certain which if any of these belonged to Mr. Cluster',” explains the legal complaint filed by the patient and his wife.

As a consequence, the Clusters say they had to pay for the manufacture of a synthetic implant, which was then used to cover the hole in his skull. To make matters worse, the newly attached flap then became infected, resulting in a need for additional surgery.

Despite being allegedly responsible for misplacing the skull fragment, the complaint said Emory made no bones about charging Cluster for the synthetic implant, the surgical procedures, and the extra time that he had to spend in hospital. According to the legal complaint, this resulted in the patient and his wife having to pay $146,845 in medical expenses thanks to the hospital’s negligence.

The couple are now seeking compensation for the hole left in their pocket, arguing that Emory failed to provide  “ordinary and reasonable care” when dealing with Cluster’s skull.


Written by 

Add us as a Google preferred source to see more of our
trusted coverage in Search