Skip to main content

Ad

nature-iconNature
clock-iconPUBLISHEDApril 17, 2026

Scientists Thought They Knew How New DNA Was Made. A Newly Discovered Bacterial Defense System Might Have Just Changed That

The "rules" of biology aren't always set in stone.

Holly Large headshot

Holly Large

Holly Large headshot

Holly Large

Copy Editor & Staff Writer

Holly has a degree in Medical Biochemistry from the University of Leicester. Her scientific interests include genomics, personalized medicine, and bioethics.

Copy Editor & Staff Writer

Holly has a degree in Medical Biochemistry from the University of Leicester. Her scientific interests include genomics, personalized medicine, and bioethics.View full profile

Holly has a degree in Medical Biochemistry from the University of Leicester. Her scientific interests include genomics, personalized medicine, and bioethics.

View full profile
EditedbyJohannes Van Zijl

Johannes holds an MSci in Neuroscience from King’s College London, where he worked on projects involving Alzheimer’s disease and Fragile X syndrome.

abstract illustration of a DNA strand, in blue

Typically, DNA or RNA is used as a template for making new DNA.

Image credit: 3Dsss/Shutterstock.com


As someone who’s sat through many molecular biology lectures, I can reliably inform you that students are repeatedly told what’s said to be a fundamental rule about DNA: to make more of it, it has to be copied from a template. At least, scientists thought that was the case. Not so, say the researchers who’ve just discovered a bacterial defense system that appears to do things differently.

The rest of this article is behind a paywall. Please sign in or subscribe to access the full content.

The "typical" way

There are two templates that might be used to make new DNA. The first is DNA itself; this involves a sequence of enzymes first “unzipping” the DNA (a double-stranded helix), then pairing up new nucleotides – the classic A, T, C, and G – with those on the separated strands (As with Ts, Cs with Gs), and Bob’s your uncle, you’ve now got two identical DNA molecules.

Then there’s RNA. In this case, a nifty little group of enzymes called reverse transcriptases are the ones adding on the nucleotides to the single-stranded RNA, transforming it into a double-stranded bit of DNA. It’s this method that HIV uses to convert its RNA genome into DNA and hijack the cellular machinery of its hosts.

A different approach

Reverse transcriptases don’t take sides, however; bacteria can also make use of them to fight viruses – specifically the group of viruses known as phages, which exclusively infect bacteria. That’s the role they play in DRT3, the defense system that’s just been discovered in bacteria by Stanford University scientists.

DRT3 is a complex made up of three different kinds of molecules: two are reverse transcriptases and the other noncoding RNA. Using a method called cryo-electron microscopy, the team were able to see that the complex has six copies of each, arranged symmetrically. 

One of the reverse transcriptases, called Drt3a, takes a typical route of DNA synthesis; it uses the chunk of non-coding RNA, which consists of the sequence ACACAC, as a template to create a single strand of DNA with repeating Ts and G. It’s the other, Drt3b, that’s thrown up a pretty significant surprise. 

Nestled within its active site – the bit of an enzyme where the reaction it’s helping along takes place – is a set of amino acids that mimic RNA. It’s this that Drt3b uses as a template for making new DNA, resulting in a single strand of As and Cs that’s complementary to the strand made by Drt3a, and upending the idea that it can only be nucleic acids like DNA and RNA that can serve as a guide.

“The protein itself serves as the blueprint for the DNA sequence,” senior author Alex Gao told Science. “That was quite a surprise,” he said, adding, “This is a fundamentally new way that life produces DNA.”

What remains unclear is exactly how this unique system helps bacteria to defend themselves from phages. Gao and the team suggest it could be acting like a “molecular sponge” of sorts, holding onto components of the phage that either trigger an immune response from the bacteria it’s attempting to infect, or render the phage functionless.

Regardless, this is one discovery that has yet again taught us that the “rules” of biology aren’t always as set in stone as they might seem.

The study is published in Science.


Written by 

Add us as a Google preferred source to see more of our
trusted coverage in Search