Skip to main content

Ad

health-iconHealth and Medicine
clock-iconPUBLISHEDOctober 15, 2018

This Year's Award For The Worst Pseudoscience Is Especially Deserved

Tom Hale headshot

Tom Hale

Tom has a Master's degree in Journalism. His editorial work covers anything from archaeology and the environment to technology and culture.

Senior Journalist

Tom has a Master's degree in Journalism. His editorial work covers anything from archaeology and the environment to technology and culture.View full profile

Tom has a Master's degree in Journalism. His editorial work covers anything from archaeology and the environment to technology and culture.

View full profile
article image

In the words of Skeptic Magazine, “Wakefield's legacy is long-lived.” Billion Photos/Shutterstock


Ladies and gentlemen, a round of applause for Andrew Wakefield, the disgraced British doctor whose "fraudulent" study on the MMR vaccine and autism helped to spark the anti-vaccination movement. The Skeptic Magazine has awarded him with this year's “Rusty Razor” award for pseudoscience and bad critical thinking.

The rest of this article is behind a paywall. Please sign in or subscribe to access the full content.

Wakefield’s 1998 paper has been described by scientists as “the most damaging medical hoax of the last 100 years." In a study of just 12 children, published in the journal The Lancet, Wakefield and his team proposed a possible link between autism and the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) jab. At a press conference, he went even further and suggested we should stop using the triple MMR vaccination and called for a return to three single injections. Fired up by some very careless media reporting, the study started to gain a huge amount of public attention worldwide, leading to a sudden slump in vaccination rates across the UK and beyond.

However, you might have noticed that the study now has bold red “RETRACTED” stamps all over it.

It took several years to fully sink in, by which time the damage had been done, but it eventually became clear that many of his claims were unsupported by scientific evidence. In 2004, investigative journalist Brian Deer wrote a major story for The Times about Wakefield’s undisclosed financial interests. Deer also uncovered in 2009 how Wakefield had “changed and misreported results” in the landmark study by fiddling with the patients' data.

Shit really hit the fan in 2010, when The Lancet officially retracted the paper. In the same year, the General Medical Council found Wakefield guilty of “serious professional misconduct” and struck off him of the Medical Register, meaning he could no longer legally practice as a doctor in the UK. Wakefield has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing. To this day, he continues to direct documentaries and publish books purporting this widely discredited idea.

-

So, why is Wakefield only receiving the “Rusty Razor” award now in 2018?

The anti-vaxxer movement has had an ugly resurgence in recent years, in turn prompting a notable rise of easily preventable diseases across the developed world. Just last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a report that found the number of US children under the age of two who haven’t received any life-saving immunizations has quadrupled since 2001.

In the words of Skeptic Magazine, “Wakefield's legacy is long-lived.”


Written by 

Add us as a Google preferred source to see more of our
trusted coverage in Search