Skip to main content

Ad

space-iconSpace and Physics
clock-iconPUBLISHEDApril 2, 2021
comments icon3

The Fabled 'Fuel-less' EmDrive May Not Work After All, Suggests New Studies

Jack Dunhill headshot

Jack Dunhill

Jack Dunhill headshot

Jack Dunhill

Social Media Coordinator and Staff Writer

Jack has a degree in Medical Genetics from the University of Leicester.

Social Media Coordinator and Staff Writer

Jack has a degree in Medical Genetics from the University of Leicester.View full profile

Jack has a degree in Medical Genetics from the University of Leicester.

View full profile
article image

A concept for the 'Impossible Engine'. Image Credit: Andrey Suslov/Shutterstock.com


4 years ago, a radical new engine design produced by NASA made waves in science by reportedly creating thrust without using any fuel. The so-called EmDrive was built and tested at NASA’s Eagleworks Laboratories and, despite essentially defying the laws of physics, it supposedly produced thrust purely from electricity, with their results being published in a dubious peer-reviewed piece.  

The rest of this article is behind a paywall. Please sign in or subscribe to access the full content.

The hype was immense – media outlets rushed to cover it, suggesting the device might actually work despite skepticism, and China even began work on their own version. 

Sadly, ever the bearer of bad news, a new report suggests the EmDrive may not work after all.  

In a demystifying series of 3 studies (Study 1Study 2, and Study 3) published in the Proceedings of Space Propulsion Conference 2020, researchers from the Dresden University of Technology have tested the proposed EmDrive and found that the results published previously may have not been the EmDrive producing thrust, but instead, an artifact resulting from heat produced by the device. 

“With the aid of a new measuring scale structure and different suspension points of the same engine, we were able to reproduce apparent thrust forces similar to those measured by the NASA-team, but also to make them disappear by means of a point suspension,” said Professor Tajmar, speaking to German media outlet GreWi

“When power flows into the EmDrive, the engine warms up. This also causes the fastening elements on the scale to warp, causing the scale to move to a new zero point. We were able to prevent that in an improved structure. Our measurements refute all EmDrive claims by at least 3 orders of magnitude.” 

The classical EmDrive is a concept device that supposedly reflected microwaves within the device to produce thrust, using just electricity and requiring no fuel. It quickly gained the nickname ‘The Impossible Engine’ because the drive simply does not make sense under our current understanding of the conservation of momentum, among a slew of other important physics laws. 

There’s always been a fair amount of skepticism when it comes to the EmDrive. Back in 2016, a peer-reviewed paper made waves as it announced the measurement of a tiny amount of thrust from the design. The thrust-to-power ratio seen was of 1.2±0.1  mN/kW - that is to say that for every kilowatt entered into the system, the output thrust was equivalent to 1.2 millinewtons.
Certainly not enough to send a rocket to space but if it were possible to scale it up, it could be used for deep space propulsion without having to use any fuel.
 
However, Professor Tajmar and his team believe in their new studies that both the classical EmDrive and the LemDrive variant are not what they were hyped up to be. Their results suggest the findings of the 2016 paper to be a product of the measurement techniques used at the time, which struggle to fully remove positives.
  

While the results still aren’t conclusive proof it does not work, it certainly casts a large amount of doubt over the possibility of fuel-less thrust from EmDrive. Many will be disappointed, but this is what science is truly about – reporting findings and peers reproducing the results, hoping for similar outcomes. Sometimes, this leads to even greater discoveries, and with the improved testing equipment gained from these studies, it appears possible this will be the case. 

[H/T: GreWi]


Written by 

Add us as a Google preferred source to see more of our
trusted coverage in Search