In March of this year, a team of California-based medical and genetic researchers published a paper that seemingly answered many of the burning questions surrounding the mysterious “Atacama Alien”.
Said to have been unearthed from the church graveyard of an abandoned town in Chile’s Atacama desert, the partially mummified 15-centimeter (6-inch) remains had shocked and puzzled the world since 2003, thanks to their tiny stature and uncanny fusion of features from a human skeleton and a classic “little green man” Hollywood alien.
Captivated by the oddity and hoping to discover the true origin of the remains, Professor Garry Nolan of Stanford University performed a detailed examination of the bones before looping in Atul Butte, from UCSF, for a whole genome analysis. After five years of work, Nolan and Butte concluded that the remains, which they affectionately nicknamed "Ata", belong to a preterm fetus that died approximately 40 years ago. They stated that the abnormal morphology and contradictory bone plate condition – which initially suggested Ata was 6 to 8 years old at the time of death – could be explained by the many genetic mutations they identified.
But now, an international group of experts in anatomy, anthropology, archaeology, and obstetrics and gynecology is calling these findings into question.
In an article published in the International Journal of Paleopathology, lead author Sian Halcrow and her colleagues argue that the available physical evidence does not support Nolan and Butte’s claim that Ata is riddled with malformations. Moreover, they assert that the previously encountered DNA sequence variations discovered in Ata's genome are unlikely to cause skeletal or joint problems and the effects of the novel mutations simply cannot be inferred at this time. The truth is seems, is much simpler.