Intelligence Reports Suggest Russia Lost A Nuclear-Powered Missile At Sea

This story has more questions than answers at present. IF1974/Shutterstock

Robin Andrews 24 Aug 2018, 17:46

We all lose small things from time to time. Sometimes, misplaced matters can be a little more serious: losing species is never great, even if it’s just through genetic testing, and no one ever wants to lose the world’s only sample of metallic hydrogen.

For now, though, it looks like the Russian armed forces are topping the bill: CNBC, citing anonymous US intelligence sources, reports that they are looking for a “nuclear-powered” missile that was lost at sea – perhaps one of four. There’s a high chance that they’ll never find it, or them.

Earlier this year, Vladimir Putin gave a bellicose speech, claiming that weapons experts were developing a cruise missile, powered by nuclear tech, that could hit any point on Earth. Plenty of speculation then began as to how exactly such a weapon could work, but – as pointed out in this excellent Vox piece – it’s not really worth losing any sleep over.

Sure, these cruise missiles, if capable of hitting any target on Earth as was suggested, sound scary, but new weapons are being developed all the time by Russia, China, and the US in particular. Plenty of scary headlines about Russian supersonic or even hypersonic arsenals keep cropping up, but many leave out or are unaware of the fact that this technology is again being developed by those other nations too.

Putin’s springtime speech was partly designed to inspire fear, both in its enemies and in its own populace, who are often told that they are at risk of an attack. More fear works well for authoritarian regimes, particularly in the run-up to already rigged elections. (Putin’s speech was on March 1, just 17 days before the elections.)

The Barents Sea. Google Earth

In any case, these missiles were being built. Plans for such missiles have been around since the 1950s, when the US first took on the idea. Per ArsTechnica, the idea was to essentially swap out the conventional combustion engine in a jet or missile and instead put in a nuclear reactor, providing thrust and maintaining very long-term fuel supplies.

Full Article
Comments

If you liked this story, you'll love these

This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By continuing to use our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.