Space

NASA Plans To Send People To Mars By 2035

May 31, 2014 | by Stephen Luntz

Photo credit: NASA. Forty-five years ago NASA was creating images like this, but in the meantime little progress has been made on reaching Mars

NASA has recommitted itself to landing humans on Mars by 2035, but has admitted that this is a project that will require the world to work together.

NASA's chief scientist Ellen Stofan gave a talk to the Royal Institution in London a fortnight ago, and video of the talk has now been released. "This is not something any one nation can do on their own," Stofan said. "It's something that humanity is going to do together." 

Stofan sees a Mars mission as a crucial part of the quest to answer the three questions she says turn up repeatedly in NASA's goals: “Are we alone, how did we get here and how does the universe work.” Mars is particularly important for answering the other two, she argued, although she also talked about the potential for life on Europa and Enceladus.

The capacity of humans to collect the information we need to “understand Mars” still far exceeds anything rovers can manage, Stefan said. For this reason it is worth the vastly higher cost assocaited with sending people who need to be sustained on the journey. “We're not sending astronauts to Mars, we're sending scientists,” she said. “We're not going there for the fun of it, we're going to do science.”

President Obama announced plans for a mission to Mars in 2010 and continues to plan on that timeline, but the commitment has been questioned. Any program that will take so long to produce results is highly vulnerable to changes in priorities and funding cutbacks. Stofan herself noted “We're trying to do something very bold over a long timespan, and that is something challenging in a world that usually doesn't work of 5, 10, 20 year time horizons.”

Stofan says that before we can send people to Mars we need to know much more, particularly about the effects of microgravity on humans over such a long time and how to maintain a healthy diet over such a time with no opportunity to resupply.. 

One of the major questions facing a Mars mission is whether the mission will be a quick visit like the Moon landings, or part of a colonization program. "I don't think that first group will necessarily stay there, but we need to think of this as establishing an outpost," Stofan said. "We want it to be possible for those people to come back if they want to, but it's the beginning of sustained human presence on Mars." 

A common criticism of NASA's Mars program is that it is being distracted by programs such as a return to the Moon and exploration of asteroids. Stofan defended these programs. "The moon remains an extremely important target," she said. "The moon has preserved our history,” when erosion removed it from the Earth. 

Jim Adams, NASA's deputy chief technologist also spoke, describing plans to capture an asteroid for study. "We first thought, 'We'll send an astronaut to an asteroid,' " he said. "Then we realized how hard that is. Just to catch up to one requires so much rocket propulsion, it's almost impossible. Once we find the right one, we'll use all the technology we've got. We'll snag it, we'll bag it and we'll drag it into orbit around the moon. Then we can send humans to a target that enables us to practice deep space operations." 

Towards this goal, NASA is keeping a look out for asteroids around 10m long we could capture in this way and use as a test site for landing. "The point isn't the asteroid," Adams said. "It's the living and working together and the technology to be able to do that."