Here's The World's First Psychological Profile Of The "Alt-Right"

White supremacists, neo-Nazis, and alt-right members marched on Charlottesville, Va on August 11 with tragic consequences. Samuel Corum/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Type “alt-right” into Google and you’ll stumble across plenty of think-pieces on the subject. Journalists and political commentators on all sides have attempted to understand this new and insidious force in (mainly) American politics, which doesn’t appear to be going away anytime soon. In fact, now that Trump is in the White House, it has only intensified.

The so-called alternative right might be extremely vocal but it is also extremely vague. It resembles a loose coalition of far right advocates more than it does a clear and concise ideology. Beyond themes of white supremacy, anti-establishment attitudes, and not-so-discreet racism, there is not all that much known about what it stands for. So psychologists Patrick Forscher and Nour Kteily decided to put together a psychological profile on the group. It is still a working paper, but the results were published in a preprint last week, which is available to read here.

To create this profile, Forscher and Kteily recruited 447 self-identified members of the alt-right and sent them an online survey, which tested them on a series of psychological measures. The researchers then compared these responses to those of a control group of 382 people.

Much confirms what we already know about the alt-right: they distrust mainstream media and politicians, they show greater support for pro-white organizations and are more likely to show bias against black people. They also score higher on what is known as the dark triad of personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy.

Neither is the demographic all that shocking. Men outnumbered women two to one. The vast majority (93.3 percent) were white. Almost three-quarters supported Trump in the 2016 election, while one in 10 chose not to vote at all. Surprisingly, they found that just over 5 percent backed Hillary Clinton.

Perhaps most terrifyingly of all, participants were asked to rate how advanced they believed different groups of people to be on a scale of zero (not at all human) to 100 (entirely human). Warning: the results are pretty horrific.

When asked to rate people on a scale of 0 to 100, participants were shown this (totally false) picture of man's "evolution". Miceking/Shutterstock

Alt-righters rated white people higher than all other groups, placing them at a 91.8 on the evolutionary scale, whereas Jews were rated 73.09, Mexicans 67.75, black people 64.72 and Muslims 55.4. Women were judged to be less evolved than men (88.47 versus 83.12).

Feminists were particularly despised (57.22). Republicans were considered to be more evolved than Democrats (82.78 versus 60.38) but the lowest scorer was Hillary Clinton (54.83).

Full Article
Comments

If you liked this story, you'll love these

This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By continuing to use our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.