UN Declares That Internet Restrictions Violate Human Rights

A wide view of the Human Rights and Alliance of Civilizations Room. United Nations Photo/Flickr; CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Robin Andrews 05 Jul 2016, 17:36

A new non-binding resolution from the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has declared that public Internet access should not be disrupted by governments or governmental agencies. While not quite declaring access to the Internet a human right, the statement does affirm that the same rights people have offline should also be protected online – in particular, the aspect of freedom of expression covered by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).

The resolution was passed by majority rather than universal consensus, which means that there were some notable dissenters. It won’t come as much of a surprise to many that the authoritarian regimes of Russia, China, and Saudi Arabia – all of whom have a notably sketchy attitude towards human rights in general – voted in favor of amendments that would water down the motion. Disappointingly, South Africa, another nation that has governance trust issues, did much the same, as did India, a democratic nation in name, but not always in practice.

As reported by The Verge, these nations actually called for the UNHRC to delete a passage that “condemns unequivocally measures to intentionally prevent or disrupt access to our dissemination of information online,” which strongly suggests that these nations’ governments are fairly keen on having the ability to cut off Internet access to groups that they find troublesome. Their efforts were resoundingly rejected by at least 70 other nations.

As aforementioned, this resolution is non-binding, so there cannot be any legal action against governments that go against it, but even if it was binding, it’s difficult to see at present how the UNHRC would punish offenders, of which many currently exist.

China and Russia, for example, are already well known for enacting Internet shutdowns – with China’s infamous “Great Firewall” being the prime example of something that runs directly counter to this new declaration. Turkey is a recent addition to this ignominious club.


Oppressive regimes are known for completely shutting out Internet access for long periods of time. bymandesigns/Shutterstock

Full Article

If you liked this story, you'll love these

This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By continuing to use our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.