Here's How Radioactive Sheep Indicate That The Vela Incident Was A Secretive Nuclear Explosion

Pictured here is the 1954 Castle Bravo test in Bikini Atoll, conducted by the US. Test detonations in space, underwater, and in-atmosphere were banned from 1963 onwards. Only underground tests were permitted. US Department of Energy

Robin Andrews 15 Aug 2018, 15:40

What have the thyroids of Australian sheep got to do with a nuclear explosion? Well, according to a study published in the journal Science & Global Security, the presence of iodine-131 within said sheep from the late 1970s is yet more evidence that the Vela Incident was indeed a secretive nuclear test.

This tale begins in 1963, with the signing of the Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT). Signed and ratified by most of the world (with the notable exception of China, among several others), it prohibited the test detonations of all nuclear weapons unless they were subterranean.

In order to make sure the Soviet Union complied with the PTBT, the US launched Project Vela, a monitoring program that involved satellites. On September 22, 1979, one of these satellites spotted a huge uptick in gamma and X-rays near the Prince Edward Islands – owned by South Africa – in the southern Indian Ocean, possibly consistent with a nuclear blast.

Although the Vela instruments could also pick up on natural electromagnetic radiation spikes, including those from deep space, the nuke hypothesis remains the most prominent.

Per Gizmodo, the key piece of evidence was the “double flash” spotted by the satellite, indicative of a nuclear blast. The intense heat of the blast briefly strips the air of electrons, meaning it is opaque for the shortest of moments before the shockwave pushes it out the way and the light can be seen again – hence, double flash.

The location of the Vela Incident's double flash. Google Earth

It’s been largely thought by those in the know that the incident was a nuclear test by Israel, with apartheid-era South Africa playing a supporting role. The US, a staunch ally of Israel – which still denies responsibility – has long obfuscated on the issue. An otherwise cautious CIA report from 1980 notes that the yield of the atmospheric blast would have been about a fifth of that of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

Back in 2015, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS) explained that the mounting circumstantial and scientific evidence for such an event, although increasingly compelling, was yet to be conclusive.

Full Article
Comments

If you liked this story, you'll love these

This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By continuing to use our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.