Fearsome Dinosaur With Ludicrously Tiny Arms Means T. Rex Wasn't Alone

Artists' impression of two G. shinyae hunting down their prey. Jorge González and Pablo Lara
Robin Andrews 14 Jul 2016, 17:21

Despite its fearsomeness, the Tyrannosaurus rex was somewhat of an awkward, clumsy dinosaur. If it fell forwards while running, its tiny arms would not only be useless in helping it stand up again, but it would hit the ground so hard it’d crush its own skull. In fact, its silly arms are one of its defining features, and a new PLOS ONE study has revealed that this bizarre trait evolved independently in other dinosaurs.

A newly-excavated dinosaur from Patagonia has been found with a pair of ludicrously tiny arms ending in short, two-fingered claws. This sizeable theropod was a carnivorous, bipedal, bird-like dinosaur, meaning that it’s somewhat related to the T. rex.

However, it’s technically part of the Allosauridae group – a completely different branch of the family tree. This means that little forelimbs didn’t evolve from a short-armed common ancestor, but arose separately several times in a process known as convergent evolution.

Gualicho [shinyae] is kind of a mosaic dinosaur, it has features that you normally see in different kinds of theropods,” corresponding author Peter Makovicky, The Field Museum's Curator of Dinosaurs, said in a statement. “It's really unusual – it's different from the other carnivorous dinosaurs found in the same rock formation, and it doesn't fit neatly into any category.”

Dating back to the Late Cretaceous, the final chapter in the story of the non-avian dinosaurs, this 90-million-year-old beast would have been a fearsome predator, hunting down prey with its powerful legs and crushing them with razor sharp teeth-lined jaws. It was about 1.8 meters (6 feet) tall, 7.6 meters (25 feet) long, and weighed about 1 tonne (1.1 tons). It also predated the appearance of the famous T. rex by about 23 million years.

Just like the T. rex’s, the true function of its arms – actually the size of a human child’s arms – remains decidedly unclear. Some have hypothesized that they were used as part of mating practices, but there really isn’t enough evidence to confidently conclude anything at this point.

A sketch of the new beast. Only the white-shaded parts were found, so around three-quarters of the skeleton had to be inferred. Jorge González and Pablo Lara/PLOS ONE

Full Article

If you liked this story, you'll love these

This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By continuing to use our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.