New Technology Offers Hope For Storing Carbon Dioxide Underground

guest author image

Dom Wolff-Boenisch

Guest Author

Iceland’s geothermal power plants are an ideal place to test pumping carbon dioxide underground. Dom Wolff-Boenisch, Author provided

The Conversation

To halt climate change and prevent dangerous warming, we ultimately have to stop pumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. While the world is making slow progress on reducing emissions, there are more radical options, such as removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and storing them underground.

In a paper published today in Science my colleagues and I report on a successful trial converting carbon dioxide (CO?) to rock and storing it underground in Iceland. Although we trialled only a small amount of CO?, this method has enormous potential.


Here’s how it works.

Turning CO? To Rock

Our paper is the culmination of a decade of scientific field and laboratory work known as CarbFix in Iceland, working with a group of international scientists, among them Wallace Broecker who coined the expression “global warming” in the 1970s. We also worked with the Icelandic geothermal energy company Reykjavik Energy.

The idea itself to convert CO? into carbonate minerals, the basis of limestone, is not new. In fact, Earth itself has been using this conversion technique for aeons to control atmospheric CO? levels.


However, scientific opinion had it up to now that converting CO? from a gas to a solid (known as mineralisation) would take thousands (or tens of thousands) of years, and would be too slow to be used on an industrial scale.

To settle this question, we prepared a field trial using Reykjavik Energy’s injection and monitoring wells. In 2012, after many years of preparation, we injected 248 tonnes of CO? in two separate phases into basalt rocks around 550m underground.

Most CO? sequestration projects inject and store “supercritical CO?”, which is CO? gas that has been compressed under pressure to considerably decrease its volume*. However, supercritical CO? is buoyant, like a gas, and this approach has thus proved controversial due to the possibility of leaks from the storage reservoir upwards into groundwater and eventually back to the atmosphere.

In fact, some European countries such as the Netherlands have stopped their efforts to store supercritical CO? on land because of lack of public acceptance, driven by the fear of possible leaks in the unforeseeable future. Austria went even so far as to ban underground storage of carbon dioxide outright.


Our Icelandic trial worked in a different way. We first dissolved CO? in water to create sparkling water. This carbonated water has two advantages over supercritical CO? gas.

The injection well with monitoring station in the background. Dom Wolff-Boenisch, Author provided

First, it is acidic, and attacks basalt which is prone to dissolve under acidic conditions.

Second, the CO? cannot escape because it is dissolved and will not rise to the surface. As long as it remains under pressure it will not rise to the surface (you can see the same effect when you crack open a soda can; only then is the dissolved CO? released back into the air).


Dissolving basalt means elements such as calcium, magnesium, and iron are released into pore water. Basaltic rocks are rich in these metals that team up with the dissolved CO? and form solid carbonate minerals.

Basalt columns in Devils Causeway. Shutterstock

Through observations and tracer studies at the monitoring well, we found that over 95% of the injected CO? (around 235 tonnes) was converted to carbonate minerals in less than two years. While the initial amount of injected CO? was small, the Icelandic field trial clearly shows that mineralisation of CO? is feasible and more importantly, fast.

Storing CO? Under The Oceans


The good news is this technology need not be exclusive to Iceland. Mineralisation of CO? requires basaltic or peridotitic rocks because these types of rocks are rich in the metals required to form carbonates and bind the CO?.

As it turns out the entire vast ocean floor is made up of kilometre-thick oceanic basaltic crust, as are large areas on the continental margins. There are also vast land areas covered with basalt (so-called igneous provinces) or peridotite (so-called “ophiolitic complexes”).

The overall potential storage capacity for CO? is much larger than the global CO? emissions of many centuries. The mineralisation process removes the crucial problem of buoyancy and the need for permanent monitoring of the injected CO? to stop and remedy potential leakage to the surface, an issue that supercritical CO? injection sites will face for centuries or even millennia to come.

On the downside, CO? mineralisation with carbonated water requires substantial amounts of water, meaning that this mineralisation technique can only succeed where vast supplies of water are available.


However, there is no shortage of seawater on the ocean floor or continental margins. Rather, the costs involved present a major hurdle to this kind of permanent storage option, for the time being at least.

In the case of our trial, a tonne of mineralised CO? via carbonated water cost about US$17, roughly twice that of using supercritical CO? for storage.

It means that as long as there are no financial incentives such as a carbon tax or higher price on carbon emissions, there is no real driving force for carbon storage, irrespective of the technique we use.

*Correction: The sentence has been corrected to note that gas volume rather than density decreases when it is compressed. Thankyou to the readers who pointed out the error.



Dom Wolff-Boenisch, Senior Lecturer, Western Australian School of Mines, Curtin University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.