These Are The Nine Greatest Threats To The Future Of Humanity Right Now

No, zombie apocalypse didn't top the list. At least, not this year. Tithi Luadthong/Shutterstock

What's the biggest threat to the future of humanity right now? Will our robot overlords finally turn on us, or will the hate speech used by certain world leaders incite us to become murderous hordes and we'll just take each other out? In its annual report on global risks, Swedish non-profit Global Challenges Foundation has announced the nine most likely ways humanity could be wiped out.

The Global Catastrophic Risks report is based on scientific research and contributions from leading academic experts to “create a deeper understanding of catastrophic risk, and thereby to spark a discussion of how the management of such risks can be developed and improved.”

“We fret about familiar risks – air crashes, carcinogens in food, low radiation, etc. – and they’re all intensely studied,” wrote Martin Rees, UK Astronomer Royal and co-founder of Cambridge’s Center for the Study of Existential Risk. “But we’re in denial about some emergent threats – the potential downsides of fast-developing new technologies and the risk of crossing environmental ‘tipping points.’”

Though improbable, the following scenarios could have global consequences.

Nuclear Warfare

Even an unintentional release could trigger an inadvertent nuclear war (it’s almost happened in 1962, 1983, and again in 1995. Oops.) Keith Tarrier/Shutterstock

Although the probability of global nuclear warfare is estimated to be no more than 1 percent, even one detonation could kill as much as 95 percent of the people within a 4-kilometer radius of detonation with very severe damage extending six times as far.

Russia and the US are home to the world’s largest arsenals, each with about 7,000 warheads, with the UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel also housing nukes. According to one scenario, an “all-out exchange” of 4,000 nuclear weapons would not only result in an enormous loss of lives, but would release 150 teragrams of smoke, leading to an 8°C drop in global temperature for up to five years, at which point “most of the surviving world population would die from hunger”.

Biological And Chemical Warfare

Despite an international ban on the production and use of such weapons, biological or chemical agents have been used at least four different times in the last 40 years, three during wartime and once in an act of terrorism. Tereshchenko Dmitry/Shutterstock

Unlike nuclear, biological and chemical weapons can be developed at a relatively low cost and distributed in a variety of ways throughout entire regions, releasing pathogens worldwide that could result in pandemics, whether through accidental or intentional release. 

Catastrophic Climate Change

Current efforts aim at mitigating low- to mid-range scenarios with a temperature increase of up to 2°C, but there is potential for a “tail end” risk for an even greater increase. Even a less than 2°C rise would intensify and make tropical cyclones more frequent, collapse entire ecosystems, deteriorate agricultural land, lose reliably freshwater sources, and push major coastal cities under water, relocating more than 1 billion people.

Ecological Collapse

Similar events could have caused the end of other civilizations, such as Easter Island, but today we’re more interconnected, meaning the effects would be felt globally. Ecological diversity is threatened by habitat and biodiversity loss, pollution, and temperature increases. Alberto Loyo/Shutterstock

Pushing ecosystems beyond their tipping point could diminish biodiversity and freshwater supplies, cause agricultural capacity to plummet, and drastically deteriorate our daily living conditions. 

Full Article
Comments

If you liked this story, you'll love these

This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By continuing to use our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.