Study Reveals How Humanity Has Dramatically Altered One Of The Planet's Major Carbon Sinks

This has to stop. Rich Carey/Shutterstock

It’s a grim and well-established fact that humanity is pretty good when it comes to trashing the planet. From plastic pollution to climate change, from species destruction to habitat destruction, there’s no question about it: we’re number one.

A new study in Nature has highlighted yet another way in which humanity has drastically and negatively altered the planet. According to a team led by the Institute of Social Ecology in Vienna, we’re responsible for cutting the amount of plant biomass stocks on Earth in half.

This research highlights that vegetation is a major store of carbon. Although it’s not quite as good as our oceans – which are arguably the most effective carbon sink the planet has to offer – trees and plants do soak up a fair amount of our carbon dioxide, and without them, the world would be far warmer.

According to the paper’s estimates, the planet’s vegetation currently stores 450 petagrams of carbon, which is equivalent to almost 0.5 trillion tons. That’s over 12 times the total carbon footprint of humanity in 2016, according to the Global Carbon Atlas – which strongly suggests that the world would be prohibitively warm if it wasn’t for this viridian carbon sink.

Using cutting-edge biomass datasets, however, the team suggest that 916 petagrams, or just over 1 trillion tons of carbon would be locked up in vegetation today if humanity hadn’t been around to interfere with it. That’s more than double the real figure, which means that we have been annihilating a key carbon sink that would otherwise have strongly mitigated anthropogenic climate change.

“Humans have halved the biomass carbon storage,” Professor Karlheinz Erb, of the Institute of Social Ecology in Vienna and lead author of the paper, told IFLScience.

It’ll probably come as no surprise that deforestation has literally eaten away at the planet’s stocks of biomass. It's important to note, though, that it's not just cutting down trees that's having an effect here, and that's what Elb et al. have zeroed in on.

Full Article
Comments

If you liked this story, you'll love these

This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By continuing to use our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.