In the first six months after a new law banned the sale and production of psychoactive substances in Britain, over 31 shops have been shut and four people convicted. But there are early indications that the law could actually be increasing the street market for synthetic cannabinoids – commonly known as “spice” – but at higher costs.
The main goal of the Psychoactive Substances Act, introduced at the end of May 2016, was to shut down shops and websites trading in psychoactive substances – formerly referred to as “legal highs”. The new law makes it an offence to produce, import or supply any psychoactive substance if it is likely to be used for its psychoactive effects, regardless of its potential for harm. Possession of a psychoactive substance is not an offence.
To enforce the Act, tough sentences for offenders were introduced, including up to seven years in prison for the supply, production, possession with intent to supply, importation or exportation of a psychoactive substance. New powers have also been given to the police, who can use prohibition and premise orders to shut down shops that sell drugs paraphernalia, known as headshops, and online dealers.
According to a press release from the Home Office at the end of December, since the Act came into force, the police have stopped 332 shops across the UK from selling psychoactive substances, and 31 headshops have closed down.
Spice for sale
From these figures, it would appear that the new Act is having the desired impact. But although the police may be stopping sales on the high street, as our research predicted before the introduction of the new law, the prevalence of synthetic cannabinoids – commonly known as “spice” – shows no sign of decreasing.
Our study – which is not yet publicly available – conducted in Manchester in early 2016, found that synthetic cannabinoids were by far the most commonly used psychoactive substances in the city. This was particularly the case among the homeless. As noted by one of those we interviewed for the study, synthetic cannabinoid use was “really rife” in the homeless community at the time the new law came into force, with an estimated 80 to 95% of the homeless in the city dependent synthetic cannabinoid users.
We found that the undetectable nature of synthetic cannabinoids (both in public spaces and in mandatory drug tests), their potency (when compared to skunk cannabis) and low cost – £10 for a 1.5g packet that could make up to 20 joints – made them particularly appealing for an economically disadvantaged group such as the homeless. These substances are also highly addictive, and many of those interviewed had replaced problematic use of other substances – typically heroin and crack cocaine – with just synthetic cannabinoids.
Regular users reported increased tolerance that led to many dependent synthetic cannabinoid users spending around £50 a day on their habit prior to the new law being introduced. So it was unsurprising that dependent users of synthetic cannabinoids were resorting to theft, begging and prostitution to fund their habit.
Prior to the new law, there was an already well-established street-level synthetic cannabinoid market in the area with users stockpiling them in preparation for the closure of shops selling psychoactive substances.